-->

Nptel Data Science For Engineers Week 4: Assignment 4 Solution


-: IMPORTANT NOTICE :-

Your answer is given in the explanation section, so please read carefully the explanation section for getting 100% in on the nptel assignment.


 Let f(x)=x3+3x2−24x+7

. Select the correct options from the following:


x=2 will give the maximum for f(x)

.x=2 will give the minimum for f(x)

.Maximum value of f(x) is 87.

The stationary points for f(x) are 2 and 4.

Let's analyze the given options based on the function \(f(x) = x^3 + 3x^2 - 24x + 7\):


1. \(x = 2\) will give the maximum for \(f(x)\): **False**

   To determine if \(x = 2\) gives a maximum, minimum, or neither, we need to analyze the critical points and the second derivative of the function. A maximum or minimum occurs when the first derivative is zero and the second derivative helps determine the nature of the stationary point.


   The first derivative of \(f(x)\) is \(f'(x) = 3x^2 + 6x - 24\).

   Setting \(f'(x) = 0\) and solving for \(x\), we get:

   \[3x^2 + 6x - 24 = 0\]

   \[x^2 + 2x - 8 = 0\]

   \[(x - 2)(x + 4) = 0\]

   This gives us two critical points: \(x = 2\) and \(x = -4\).


   To determine the nature of these stationary points, we need to analyze the second derivative \(f''(x)\). The second derivative is \(f''(x) = 6x + 6\).

   \(f''(2) = 6(2) + 6 = 18 > 0\), which means \(x = 2\) is a local minimum, not a maximum.


2. \(x = 2\) will give the minimum for \(f(x)\): **True**

   As discussed above, \(x = 2\) is a local minimum for \(f(x)\).


3. Maximum value of \(f(x)\) is 87: **False**

   To find the maximum value of \(f(x)\), we need to locate the critical points and evaluate the function at those points. The critical points are \(x = 2\) and \(x = -4\).

   Evaluating \(f(2)\): \(f(2) = 2^3 + 3(2)^2 - 24(2) + 7 = -9\)

   Evaluating \(f(-4)\): \(f(-4) = (-4)^3 + 3(-4)^2 - 24(-4) + 7 = 129\)

   Thus, the maximum value is 129, not 87.


4. The stationary points for \(f(x)\) are 2 and 4: **False**

   As calculated earlier, the stationary points are actually 2 and -4, not 2 and 4.


To summarize:

- \(x = 2\) will give the maximum for \(f(x)\): **False**

- \(x = 2\) will give the minimum for \(f(x)\): **True**

- Maximum value of \(f(x)\) is 87: **False**

- The stationary points for \(f(x)\) are 2 and 4: **False**


Find the gradient of f(x,y)=x2y  at (x,y)=(1,3)

.∇f=[16]

∇f=[61]

∇f=[69]

∇f=[33]

To find the gradient of the function \(f(x, y) = x^2y\), we need to compute its partial derivatives with respect to \(x\) and \(y\) and then evaluate them at the point \((x, y) = (1, 3)\).


The gradient of \(f(x, y)\) is given by:


\(\nabla f(x, y) = \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}, \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right)\)


Let's compute the partial derivatives first:

1. \(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}(x^2y) = 2xy\)

2. \(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial}{\partial y}(x^2y) = x^2\)


Now, we can evaluate these partial derivatives at \((x, y) = (1, 3)\):

1. \(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\) at \((1, 3)\) is \(2 \cdot 1 \cdot 3 = 6\)

2. \(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\) at \((1, 3)\) is \(1^2 = 1\)


So, the gradient of \(f(x, y) = x^2y\) at \((x, y) = (1, 3)\) is:


\(\nabla f(1, 3) = (6, 1)\)


Find the Hessian matrix for f(x,y)=x2y at (x,y)=(1,3)

.

∇2f=[3220]

∇2f=[3330]

∇2f=[6220]

∇2f=[6330]

The Hessian matrix is a square matrix of second partial derivatives of a function. For the function \(f(x, y) = x^2y\), the Hessian matrix will be a 2x2 matrix where each entry represents a mixed partial derivative.


The Hessian matrix is given by:


\[H = \begin{bmatrix}

\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x^2} & \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x \partial y} \\

\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial y \partial x} & \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial y^2}

\end{bmatrix}\]


Let's compute the second partial derivatives:


1. \(\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x^2} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\right) = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} (2xy) = 2y\)

2. \(\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x \partial y} = \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\right) = \frac{\partial}{\partial y} (2xy) = 2x\)

3. \(\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial y \partial x} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right) = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} (x^2) = 2x\)

4. \(\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial y^2} = \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right) = \frac{\partial}{\partial y} (x^2) = 0\)


So, the Hessian matrix for \(f(x, y) = x^2y\) is:


\[H = \begin{bmatrix}

2y & 2x \\

2x & 0

\end{bmatrix}\]


Now, evaluate this Hessian matrix at the point \((x, y) = (1, 3)\):


\[H(1, 3) = \begin{bmatrix}

2 \cdot 3 & 2 \cdot 1 \\

2 \cdot 1 & 0

\end{bmatrix}

= \begin{bmatrix}

6 & 2 \\

2 & 0

\end{bmatrix}\]

Let f(x,y)=−3x2−6xy−6y2 The point (0,0) is a

 saddle point

 maxima

 minima

The point \((0, 0)\) for the function \(f(x, y) = -3x^2 - 6xy - 6y^2\) is a **saddle point**.


In my previous response, I provided a detailed explanation of why \((0, 0)\) is indeed a saddle point based on the second partial derivatives and the Hessian determinant. The Hessian determinant evaluated at \((0, 0)\) was positive, and the second partial derivative with respect to \(x\) was negative, indicating a saddle point.


To recap: A saddle point is a critical point where the curvature of the function changes along different directions. It's neither a local minimum nor a local maximum. The Hessian determinant helps us determine the nature of the critical point. If the Hessian determinant is positive and the second partial derivatives have different signs, then the point is a saddle point.


For which numbers b is the matrix A=[1bb9] positive definite?


−3<b<3

b=3

b=−3

−3≤b≤3

To determine if the matrix \(A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & b \\ b & 9 \end{bmatrix}\) is positive definite, we need to check whether all the leading principal minors (determinants of the upper-left submatrices) are positive.


The matrix \(A\) is positive definite if and only if:


1. \(\det(A_1) = 1 > 0\) (where \(A_1\) is the 1x1 matrix containing the first element of \(A\)).

2. \(\det(A_2) = \begin{vmatrix} 1 & b \\ b & 9 \end{vmatrix} = 9 - b^2 > 0\).

3. \(\det(A_3) = \det(A) = (1)(9) - (b)(b) = 9 - b^2 > 0\).


For a matrix to be positive definite, all these conditions must be satisfied.


From the second and third conditions, we can see that \(9 - b^2 > 0\), which implies \(b^2 < 9\). This means that \(b\) must be within the range \(-3 < b < 3\) for the matrix \(A\) to be positive definite.


So, the values of \(b\) that make the matrix \(A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & b \\ b & 9 \end{bmatrix}\) positive definite are \(-3 < b < 3\).

Consider f(x)=x3−12x−5 Which among the following statements are true?


f(x) is increasing in the interval (−2,2)

.f(x) is increasing in the interval (2,∞)

.f(x) is decreasing in the interval (−∞,−2)

.f(x) is decreasing in the interval (−2,2)

To determine the intervals where the function \(f(x) = x^3 - 12x - 5\) is increasing or decreasing, we need to analyze its derivative, \(f'(x)\), and its critical points. 


First, let's find the derivative:

\[f(x) = x^3 - 12x - 5\]

\[f'(x) = 3x^2 - 12\]


Now, let's find the critical points by setting \(f'(x) = 0\) and solving for \(x\):

\[3x^2 - 12 = 0\]

\[3x^2 = 12\]

\[x^2 = 4\]

\[x = \pm 2\]


Now, let's determine the intervals where \(f(x)\) is increasing or decreasing:


1. \(f(x)\) is increasing in the interval \((-2, 2)\):

   For \(x < -2\), \(f'(x)\) is positive (e.g., \(f'(-3) = 27 - 12 = 15\)), indicating that \(f(x)\) is increasing.

   For \(-2 < x < 2\), \(f'(x)\) is negative (e.g., \(f'(-1) = 3 - 12 = -9\)), indicating that \(f(x)\) is decreasing.

   Therefore, \(f(x)\) is not increasing in \((-2, 2)\).


2. \(f(x)\) is increasing in the interval \((2, \infty)\):

   For \(x > 2\), \(f'(x)\) is positive (e.g., \(f'(3) = 27 - 12 = 15\)), indicating that \(f(x)\) is increasing.

   Therefore, \(f(x)\) is increasing in \((2, \infty)\).


3. \(f(x)\) is decreasing in the interval \((-\infty, -2)\):

   For \(x < -2\), \(f'(x)\) is positive (e.g., \(f'(-3) = 27 - 12 = 15\)), indicating that \(f(x)\) is increasing.

   Therefore, \(f(x)\) is not decreasing in \((-\infty, -2)\).


4. \(f(x)\) is decreasing in the interval \((-2, 2)\):

   For \(-2 < x < 2\), \(f'(x)\) is negative (e.g., \(f'(-1) = 3 - 12 = -9\)), indicating that \(f(x)\) is decreasing.

   Therefore, \(f(x)\) is decreasing in \((-2, 2)\).


In summary:

- \(f(x)\) is increasing in the interval \((2, \infty)\).

- \(f(x)\) is decreasing in the interval \((-2, 2)\).

.

Consider the following optimization problem:

maxx∈Rf(x), where

f(x)=x4+7x3+5x2−17x+3


Let x∗ be the maximizer of f(x) What is the second order sufficient condition for x∗ to be the maximizer of the function f(x)?

4x3+21x2+10x−17=0

12x2+42x+10=0

12x2+42x+10>0

12x2+42x+10<0

The second-order sufficient condition for a critical point \(x^*\) to be a local maximizer of the function \(f(x)\) involves examining the second derivative of the function and the value of the second derivative at the critical point. This condition helps determine whether the critical point is indeed a local maximum.


The second-order sufficient condition states that if the second derivative of the function \(f(x)\) at the critical point \(x^*\) is negative (\(f''(x^*) < 0\)), then \(x^*\) is a local maximizer.


Let's start by finding the second derivative of the function \(f(x)\):

\[f(x) = x^4 + 7x^3 + 5x^2 - 17x + 3\]

\[f'(x) = 4x^3 + 21x^2 + 10x - 17\]

\[f''(x) = 12x^2 + 42x + 10\]


Now, we want to evaluate the second derivative at the critical point \(x^*\). However, before that, we need to find the critical points by setting the first derivative equal to zero and solving for \(x\):

\[f'(x) = 4x^3 + 21x^2 + 10x - 17 = 0\]


This equation does not have a simple closed-form solution, so we might need to use numerical methods to approximate the critical points.


Once you have the approximate value of \(x^*\), you can substitute it into \(f''(x)\) to determine whether the second derivative is negative or positive at that point. If \(f''(x^*) < 0\), then \(x^*\) is a local maximizer according to the second-order sufficient condition.


Please note that determining critical points and their nature often requires numerical methods, especially when finding closed-form solutions is not straightforward.


In optimization problem, the function that we want to optimize is called

 Decision function

 Constraints function

 Optimal function

 Objective function

In an optimization problem, the function that we want to optimize is called the **objective function**. This function defines the quantity we are trying to maximize or minimize, often subject to certain constraints. The objective function's values are typically dependent on one or more variables, and the goal of optimization is to find the values of these variables that result in the optimal (maximum or minimum) value of the objective function, based on the problem's requirements.


The optimization problem minx f(x) can also be written as maxx f(x)

True

False


False.


The optimization problem \(\min_x f(x)\) is about finding the minimum value of the function \(f(x)\) by adjusting the variable \(x\).


On the other hand, the optimization problem \(\max_x f(x)\) is about finding the maximum value of the function \(f(x)\) by adjusting the variable \(x\).


So, while both optimization problems involve finding extreme values of the same function \(f(x)\), they are not equivalent and are distinct problems. The optimization problems \(\min_x f(x)\) and \(\max_x f(x)\) have different goals and can lead to different optimal solutions.

Gradient descent algorithm converges to the local minimum.

 True

 False


True.


The gradient descent algorithm is an iterative optimization technique used to find the minimum of a function. It starts from an initial point and updates the point in the direction of the negative gradient of the function. The gradient provides information about the steepest ascent of the function, so moving in the opposite direction (negative gradient) leads to the steepest descent.


However, it's important to note that gradient descent can converge to a local minimum, which might not be the global minimum. The algorithm is not guaranteed to find the global minimum, especially in the presence of multiple local minima and complex function landscapes. The convergence to a local minimum depends on the initial point, the step size (learning rate), and the shape of the function.


In summary, gradient descent is effective in finding local minima of functions, but it might not necessarily find the global minimum in all cases.

Post a Comment (0)
Previous Question Next Question